(no subject)
Nov. 24th, 2007 04:35 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)

we're reading Amusing Ourselves to Death by Neil Postman for AP lang. it's good and isn't even that long (168 pages, excluding the intro), but at times it's really hard to get through. i have 38 more pages to go. i can make it! :D
crap. i forgot that i have to do reader response journal entries for every 50 pages. :/ *facepalm*
no subject
Date: 2007-11-25 12:19 am (UTC)/randomness XDDD
no subject
Date: 2007-11-25 12:55 am (UTC)(is that a bale icon? eeeeeeee.)
no subject
Date: 2007-11-25 05:29 am (UTC)Yup, tis dear Mr. Bale from Equilibrium.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-25 03:21 am (UTC)& is that the real book? at first glance i was sure it was like, cliff's notes or something.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-25 03:30 am (UTC)it's basically about how different forms of communication (television, speech, written word, etc.) influences how the conversation is carried out through those forms (for instance, a lot of televangelists' sermons are made for entertainment and to attract more viewers, whereas a church that isn't broadcast on tv is more focused on the sacred traditions instead of showing off their huge church or having schemes to pull people in).
i really hope that made sense, haha.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-25 04:38 am (UTC)well...i mean, the concept is really cool. i don't know how it's written (boring/hard?) and a definite minus is the journal entries. but i love reading books like that though they always like...i don't want to say confuse me and i can't think of the word i want to use, but like, you're not sure if they're misleading you or leaving out important information.
last year i read fast food nation and i mean, possibly...not the best example because everyone knows america is a fat country but i always wondered how the book would sound if it was written from the perspective of someoen who works in the fast food industry trying to convince people that fast food is okay. mostly it just makes me think of michael moore's movies (possibly because i watched Sicko today). i mean, idk how you feel about michael moore but i looooove him but i feel like you have to watch some of his movie's with a bit of skepticism because obviously he's trying to prove a point and he's going to neglect to use things that disprove his point.
wow...i just totally rambled about weird things. =]
no subject
Date: 2007-11-25 04:47 am (UTC)i love michael moore too! i mean, he (and other people as well) kinda has to leave out certain things so that he doesn't negate his point/reasoning, so it's almost kinda sorta....sneaky? i don't know what i mean, haha.
nah, rambling is cool. :D
no subject
Date: 2007-11-25 05:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 12:25 am (UTC)i love all those christian bale icons you gotsies.
LOL my AP lit class is killing me, not cos its hard but cos i'm a lazy sod.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 12:33 am (UTC)i swear, i have an unhealthy obsession with him. :X
aaaanyway.
lol @ you being a lazy sod. i know what you mean. at times, AP lang is like, "ARGH" but then i think to myself, "hey. it's really not that hard. you just need to stop being lazy."
no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 12:35 am (UTC)ja. i need to quit being lazy...
but laziness sis like a delicious druggg!!